I think that's a very fair consideration, and I hope you discuss it when you get to reviewing the bill.
When I looked at sponsoring it from the Senate, I took it in its existing form. I do liken it to a bill I took through the House in the 42nd Parliament related to the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada and how commemorations of persons, places and events of national significance happen. In that case, we were looking at changing the board composition to include one first nations representative, one Métis representative and one Inuit representative.
I think that through the senator's comments we already have indigenous representation through the appointments into these positions. However, that is, I think, a bit of a concern. You could have indigenous languages or indigenous persons not represented, depending on how that appointment process.... I hope we would never have the absence of French. It does open a bit of a hole in how we make sure that inclusivity is part of this.
Therefore, I would welcome any debate you could have on that point and for you to see if you can strengthen the bill from that perspective.