Thank you.
I'd like to ask another question. However, I'm not passing judgment.
It seems to me that while there may be a lot of goodwill in the creation of these positions, there really isn't an obligation, as far as I know.
The position of poet laureate was mentioned earlier. I'm convinced that works have been produced by poets laureate. They are expected to produce works or promote art, but there is no obligation to produce results, and it will probably be the same for the parliamentary visual artist laureate. There is no indication of what is actually expected in terms of the production of works by the people who will occupy those positions.
Don't you think they should be told that during a two-year term, for example, they're expected to propose two or three works that can be permanently installed to promote arts and culture?
Shouldn't we specify something like this in our expectations of such an appointment?