In response to Ms. Gladu, in terms of the library, I'd just like to make a couple of comments that might be interesting to members.
The addition of “digital creations” from a library point of view, in some ways there's a potential for it to be slightly easier for the library to implement. I know that at your last meeting there was talk about sculpture and marble and possibly different things that might be involved in art, and as you know, poetry is words on a page. We can post the poet laureate's poems online at virtually no expense. It's very straightforward. They hold the copyright. We can read the poem and enjoy it.
When you get into visual arts, it's a very different story, of course, and you're potentially looking at painting, art, film, sculpture and so on.
For the library, from a management of the program point of view, digital creations are somewhat easier. From that perspective, in terms of potential impact, it might make management of the program easier, because, as members pointed out last week, the potential implications of some of the other art forms could be significant from a budgetary point of view.
Not having an art collection currently, this is quite a new road for us and opens up doors to things that we have not had to do in the past. Of course, if that's Parliament's wish, we will do it with dedication, but it is quite a different thing for us from poetry.
Digital creations are something that we're a little more familiar with.