It's a very interesting question.
I want to look at the office of the visual artist laureate through a lens similar to the one we would look through at the office of the poet laureate. We are looking at having an individual identified in that role who is also playing the role of advocate and spokesperson for the visual arts in a Canadian context and for Canadian creativity.
Again, while I don't want to minimize or dismiss concerns around AI as an emerging presence and technology and its place in the creative realm, I think the objective here is to find an individual we can proudly stand up as the face of expression of Canadian creativity. A big part of that role is to be an advocate as well as a creator. We've seen, in the Canadian jurisdiction and elsewhere, poet laureates championing that discipline. They are championing the practice. They're championing the work of other artists as well as their own work.
When we look at the composition of the individuals charged with the responsibility of making recommendations to the Speakers, I think we can have a high degree of confidence that they are sensitive to these issues, wrestling with them and looking for the strongest candidate possible to fulfill a full range of duties. As sophisticated as ChatGPT might be, I suspect it is not going to be quite as engaging or convincing a spokesperson as one of our fine Canadian creators.
I don't know, Dr. Lank, whether you have anything to add.