Thanks, Madam Chair.
In this subamendment from Mr. Waugh, for whom I have a lot of respect, I see that what he's actually doing is trying to reverse the subamendment I had put on the table.
I'm not convinced that it is in order. What Mr. Waugh should be doing, simply, is voting against my amendment to ensure we come back to the main motion, although, as I mentioned earlier, Madam Chair, I'm beginning to think we should withdraw all of this and start again with a fresh study.
That said, what he's trying to do is reverse an amendment. That's not something that would normally be in order, given the very clear intent of my amendment.