It is not a point of order.
Evidence of meeting #93 for Canadian Heritage in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was cbc.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #93 for Canadian Heritage in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was cbc.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
I'm allowing the point of order.
I'm sorry, Mr. Julian. You were asking...?
NDP
Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC
Could you confirm, once again, that Ms. Tait is coming next week before committee?
Conservative
Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB
It is not a point of order. If you're not going to be [Inaudible—Editor]
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
I would like to say, for the ninth time, that Ms. Tait is coming next week, on November 2.
Thank you.
Liberal
Liberal
Taleeb Noormohamed Liberal Vancouver Granville, BC
I would like to simply point out that the threat issued by Ms. Thomas towards the chair, that she “will make this hell”, is incendiary and inappropriate.
I would ask that Ms. Thomas apologize to the committee and the chair, and, if not, that the chair take whatever action she feels appropriate. That is not the environment that any of us need to be working in, and certainly not in this current climate.
Conservative
Conservative
Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB
Thank you.
Point taken. It was inappropriate for me to say that. I extend my absolute, unreserved apology to this committee.
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
Thank you, Ms. Thomas.
Do you still want to debate the subamendment? I want to ask you not to verge into being repetitive and redundant. You are making the points that you have been making over and over now. Perhaps we can recognize, as Mr. Noormohamed talked about, that respect to the committee means that I have three of your colleagues here lining up to speak on this subamendment. I have five other people on the committee lining up to speak on the subamendment—
Ms. Thomas, I'm speaking. Thank you.
We have a lot of people wishing to speak. Being respectful of the committee means that you acknowledge that everyone else has a right to speak. If you choose to filibuster this committee, Ms. Thomas, then remember that I can ask you not to be repetitive and not to be redundant.
Thank you.
Liberal
October 24th, 2023 / 12:45 p.m.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry
Thank you, Mr. Coteau.
The speakers who are lined up, in order, are Ms. Gladu, Mr. Shields, Mr. Julian, Mr. Champoux and Mr. Coteau. They're waiting patiently to be able to speak once Ms. Thomas has made her points that are not repetitive and redundant.
Thank you.
Go ahead, Ms. Thomas.
Conservative
Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB
Madam Chair, I would just raise a point of order before I continue.
I'm just curious; can you clarify the reason for Ms. Tait being brought in for two hours, according to the subamendment currently being discussed?