I am trying to understand, Ms. Thomas, whether you are debating the subamendment or whether you are speaking to the main motion, because the subamendment is pretty clear on its reasons for wanting to look at Meta. It talks about reviewing government expenditures. It's pretty clear about and having Ms. Tait arrive and speak to us for two hours instead of one. It's pretty clear about asking George Achi and the ombudsman to come. It's pretty clear on all of those things, so I don't understand your points.
Are you speaking for or against the subamendment? I would like us to focus, please, on the subamendment. Thank you.