Mr. Chair, I have enormous respect for you, and you do remarkable work as a parliamentarian, but I can't agree with your interpretation of things. We were, as we have been over the last three meetings, engaged in the motion that was presented by Mrs. Thomas, and your subamendment was before this table. We don't start afresh. That would be a misinterpretation of the rules. With respect, I'll have to challenge your interpretation. I think where we are is, as you mentioned, your subamendment, which is a subamendment to my amendment.
I'm hoping we can get on with the safe sport study. I'm certainly willing to withdraw my amendment, and I hope Mrs. Thomas is willing to withdraw hers so we can get on to safe sports. I think there are some other ideas in terms of a study we could do, but I don't agree with this interpretation that somehow we're starting afresh but that Mrs. Thomas still has a continuation from the previous meeting.
With deep respect—because you do, I think, a remarkable job—I will have to challenge your ruling.