I'm coming back to that.
Numerous times when I was speaking, the Conservatives would point to the issue of relevance. Of course, relevance and repetition are the two elements around any filibuster, so I would question both the relevance and the repetition here.
When we are talking about the subamendment, it is important to stick to the subamendment, and it is also important to ensure that there isn't repetition.
We know that Ms. Tait is coming next week, so that kind of drive-by comment is simply inappropriate. It's not relevant.
The question that you raised, Mr. Chair, is a very valid one: Should she be coming for two hours? I think that's worthy of debate and let's have that debate.