Thank you, Mr. Chair.
With the greatest of respect, this has nothing to do with points of order. Decisions by the chair, everyone says, are not debatable, but, according to the book, they can be appealed to the committee. To appeal a decision of the chair, a member must inform the committee of his or her intent to do so, which Mr. Julian did. There is an expectation, then, that the chair will call that to a vote in order to determine whether or not the chair's ruling will be upheld.
This has nothing to do with points of order. While Ms. Gladu's timeline may or may not be accurate, it's not relevant to the point Mr. Julian just made. That is the reality we have to operate in, right now. In fact, there was a request to challenge the ruling of the chair that has nothing to do with points of order. It doesn't matter. He made the request.