With respect to process, based on the overturning of the ruling of the chair, I would go back to page 1062 of the green book just so that we are all clear in terms of the speaking list specifically.
The book notes, “If either the debate or the meeting is adjourned without the committee taking a decision,” which is what happened, “the committee may resume the debate at any time afterwards at another meeting.”
My question for the clerk—this is not to be obstreperous or obstructionist; I'm just trying to understand—is this: If that is where we were, should we not be going back to the original speaking list?