Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you for being here and spending your time. I appreciate it.
As you know, the controversy has been significant. You have a plan in place that was built starting on a $30,000 contract, which almost ended up as $1 million for a California organization, but it doesn't match what the National Gallery in London has done. You talked about digital. You talked about some things, but it doesn't match what they have suggested at the London museum came out of a California...besides the HR they're doing.
Are you going to match what London does, or stick with the California one? Are you going to hire curators instead of them being your HR?