Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'd like to preface my question by highlighting some of the things about CBC that I really appreciate. One of them is a radio program called North by Northwest. It's a uniquely B.C program, and it also sells books. They interview local authors. They feature diverse content, indigenous content and extraordinary interviews. I know that many folks cite that program for purchasing their next book. That's one.
The next one is CBC Gem. A program that I love, whose name is similar to the last title, is North of North. It features a cast set in the fictitious Ice Cove, an Inuit village. I really, really love the push-and-pull between the characters. It's a comedy. It's excellent writing. It has an excellent cast. I think I binge-watched some of that. I have a free CBC Gem account, so I guess I would fall into one of the 5.3 million in that category.
I also know that there's a lot of content that you don't even need a free account to watch, such as Hockey Night in Canada and Power & Politics. CBC does lots of stuff.
I also want to highlight Radio-Canada in the metro Vancouver area. My husband is a municipal expert. He's a francophone. I know that he is interviewed on regional issues, such as transportation, emergency preparedness and housing, that the French-speaking community might not otherwise hear in B.C. I have a huge appreciation. CBC does a lot.
Many countries give their public broadcasters predictable multi-year funding, such as the BBC's licence fee or the per household models in democratic France and Germany. Given the volatility of annual funding, can you describe how the CBC might benefit from a statutory per capita model to strengthen its editorial independence and strategic planning?
