I am advised by the clerk that one way we may wish to deal with this motion—and I am seeing consensus around the table that we do it as a full committee, as Mr. Fortin has proposed, and try to work with as much efficiency as possible—would be just to defeat motion number two and not propose motion number three.
Would that be agreeable to everyone? I think that meets your purpose, and I think I am hearing around the table that we want efficiency, but at the same time the difference between eight and 11 members is not significant.
Have I read that correctly?