Yes, this is again a reference to the routine motions we deleted that would have constituted an agenda meeting. To me, it feels like these two motions, one and two, would have been appropriate had we not disregarded the subcommittee nature of the agenda and process committee.
We're now contemplating this as a whole, and I believe my friend Mr. Fortin raised an important point, which is that if we're overly prescriptive without first contemplating the work plan, there may be scenarios in which some people would require greater scrutiny, and there may be situations in which having a panel that's more varied might be better. My caution is against being overly prescriptive before we've contemplated the work plan and, given that we're already going to be deciding this on a case-by-case basis in terms of who our selected witnesses are, it's going to be agreed on by consensus anyway, so it seems to be moot at this point.