To defend my point about being open by default, I would suggest that we at least entertain and receive back whatever opinion there is on whether or not these remain sealed for 30 years. The spirit of my amendment in this regard is to provide a context for future contemplation. To me, it would defeat itself if future MPs, staff or analysts who are working on this didn't have access for 30 years. At that point, it might not make sense.
The analysts have their hands up.