If I can just recap what I heard with respect to the motion—and correct me if I have heard it wrong—I'm hearing that we could use this as guidance in terms of getting schedules in place. If we thought there was a witness we either wanted to recall or wanted to extend the time frame of, we would have that discussion at the time.
Just as a suggestion in trying to get to some sort of finish line on this, would you be comfortable with the chairs reviewing with the clerks and looking at any particular witnesses, and we could raise that as the time goes on, so we can at least start to slot things in?
I'll just put that on the table.
I have Mr. Motz and then Mr. Virani.