I think it's clear through testimony at the commission that they weren't even sharing it with each other.
From that perspective, when the incident happened in Coutts, when you talked about the progression of the emergency, as the perceived threat elevated, what was your response? For instance, we've identified that there were now jerry cans going into what was essentially a corridor and alleyway of the Prime Minister's Office, complete with a crane and a wrecking ball, and the House of Commons.
In your opinion, particularly as it relates to incendiary devices and this threat, when you found out about the threat for ideologically motivated violent extremists in Coutts—i.e., the weapons that were found embedded within the protests—did that change the tenor of your organizing and planning efforts?