But on that particular document, sir, respectfully, the last paragraph of page four reads like a convoy manifesto.
It talks about the struggling of the middle class. It talks about people rising up who otherwise wouldn't be protesting. It seems to be almost a stark warning about things to come. Here's my question for you. Given the sensitive nature of intelligence, would you not agree that you would have to have unbiased information that is based on actual fact, and not the editorialization of people like Rex Murphy, in order to make adequate threat assessments?
Would you not agree with that basic statement?