Okay, so moving on within that assessment, there is reference to persons of interest who “in some cases had access to firearms”—I'm referring to page 9 now—and some persons of interest had “made comments on open source that they intend[ed] to bring their firearms”, etc.
In at least two cases, persons of interest outside of Ottawa, and often outside of Ontario, had been met by police who seized firearms in the interest of public safety when comments about firearms had been made on open-source media.
Could you verify the extent of your intelligence that there had in fact been confiscation of firearms for the intended purpose of continuing on through the convoy to the occupation?