I was looking at both the main proposal and the amendment, and I was putting it in the context of having already heard from ministers. We are currently planning to hear from officials and law enforcement agencies for several days.
When are we going to hear from the advocacy organizations or the banks that had to implement these measures and the people affected by the situation and hear about the various problems they had?
In fact, I am concerned that the views are not balanced. I would remind you that we were trying to strike a balance between the different points of view of the witnesses. It seems to me that our choice of witnesses is leaning heavily in one same direction. I'm not sure we're going to be able to get the balance right in subsequent meetings.
I'm a little concerned that we're a little too quick to put together our witness list from government agencies or law enforcement agencies for several days in a row. It seems to me that maybe we should slow down. We could hear from ministers and then bring in witnesses with different points of view.