I think we should treat this in much the same way we treated the issue regarding legal counsel. My proposal is that we adjourn debate on this, because we're putting the cart before the horse. We don't even understand the scope yet. We haven't decided on that. Why are we pigeonholing ourselves and determining what witnesses we're calling at this point and what time we're setting aside? Right now we're actually looking at 18-plus hours of witness testimony without even understanding the full scope of the study.
On March 24th, 2022. See this statement in context.