To read the legal advice would help me understand if my interpretation of the act has any holes in it. I came to watch what happened, the invocation, and adjudge everything from it based on my reading of the act. As someone who's written about it before it was invoked, as someone who has advised on it during COVID, I have a clear understanding, in my mind, of what it means.
I'm not saying that there could not be some sort of legal precedent out there that could potentially change my mind. I would have to read that to see whether or not I would concede anything. That would be the value in reading the legal opinion, to see whether or not the common understanding of the act, and especially section 16, could give way to a different interpretation, as suggested by the government.