I think it was a constellation of blockades and protests. I think we heard that the serious threats of violence, again, as in the past, came from those who sought to co-opt the movement to advance their own violent agendas. I've seen no evidence to suggest that this was the majority of the protesters or the ultimate aim of the protesters. I don't think that's much different from protests we've seen in the past.
While there may be those amongst them, certainly those in Coutts, who fall under the definition of terrorists and pose that threat, we typically don't label the entire protest movement as terrorist because of the actions of individuals.