Well, I don't think it's fair to ask me that, because I haven't seen all of the intelligence that was relied upon by CSIS or the cabinet—especially the cabinet—to make that decision.
My point was then—and I would make the same point now—that the key is that the threat to the security of Canada has to be what drives the emergency, rather than it being the by-product of the emergency. That was really the key of what I was trying to say. There should be a causal connection there—that's how I interpret the statute—rather than it being something that happens as a result of another reason for the emergency.