It is often argued that the definition of an emergency has to be interpreted more broadly than the text of the present act.
What do you think should be the biggest difference in how that definition could be interpreted, keeping in mind that it is in a situation where there is a wish to declare an emergency? There is the text as it stands, which you are familiar with, but if we interpret it very broadly, in your opinion, how far can we go in drawing valid and justifiable conclusions?