I asked Senator Harder the question, since it is his motion. Personally, I think they are different subjects.
The motion suggests that the committee invite no further witnesses, and I agree that a date be added. Mr. Motz proposed that it be reassessed after the Rouleau report is submitted, and I agree with that.
Second, the motion then instructs the analysts to prepare a draft report, but that is another subject.
Third, the motion suggests that we must present our report before March 31. The idea of setting ourselves a deadline may be good or bad, but it is definitely a different thing.
I really think these are four different subjects. If I had to vote on the motion now, I would be unhappy about voting against it, because I agree with some of the proposals. If we keep all these items together, we may not be able to agree, when we could certainly agree on at least two or three of them.