I just want to clarify procedurally that this motion has been tabled. It is in order as it stands. What you're asking him to do, essentially, would be to withdraw the motion and re-put it point by point, and I get a sense that's not the intention. From that perspective, while the intervention is appreciated, it doesn't have a procedural precedent.
Are there any other people who would like to speak to the amendment?
Given that we don't have a speakers list, I would now like to put the question on Mr. Motz's amendment.
Perhaps we could have the clerk read it out before we go to the vote.