You just had a discussion with Mr. Brock about the production of the opinion that was provided with respect to the invocation of the act. Leaving aside the issue of solicitor-client privilege, I think that discussion is a glaring example of how this committee has gone beyond its mandate, because given the terms of reference for this committee, that opinion has no relevance here whatsoever.
Minister LeBlanc, you suggested that you're going to have some response to Justice Rouleau. You and Minister Virani—but particularly you, Minister LeBlanc—are going to put forward some proposals with respect to how the legislation can be improved. Unfortunately, you might be in a situation of not having a report from this committee. I'm wondering if you have any thoughts about how the legislation could be reviewed now and whether one of those proposals might include redefining the scope of this committee in terms of a time frame so we don't run into this situation of the committee going beyond its scope and beyond its time and turning into something it was never meant to be.