I'm a newbie on this particular committee, but I've been listening to all of the testimony.
I have what I don't think is a simple question. I've written down some of the facts about what's transpired here. I guess, in my mind, because I come from a business environment, there appears to be an opportunity to get together and make some decisions as to what exactly needs to be translated, if something is missing. I would think that, between both groups, you would have a flow chart. You would have the key issues on a flow chart, showing from start to finish what needs to be done. Has that taken place?
It's nice to have everybody giving testimony, but there's so much data that you've given to us that it seems to be flying up in the air. Have there been discussions in terms of taking the proper steps to have a solution that's going to benefit the whole group of people interested in trying to get a solution as opposed to going around in a circle?
I hate to be rude, but listening to this for the last period of time, it seems to be a bit of a revolving door. Let's get by who is guilty or who didn't do their job. Let's get on with getting the problem solved. I'm sorry to be so blunt, but, God, I spent 30 years of my life running businesses. I'd probably have had some of you in front of me in a private office asking these questions before we even got in here.
We've spent time. What have we accomplished?