Barring, Mr. Motz, the information being something that would prejudice, for example, a criminal investigation or that would damage national security in some way, my answer would be yes. The goal would be to be as transparent and open as possible.
What sorts of information? I cited, for example: What is the basis on which Ontario decided there was a threat to national security?
It is appropriate for you to ask whether the threshold for invoking the act was met. You need to look at the evidence that justified invoking the act.
When I wrote the act, I was affected by the experience of the War Measures Act in 1970. At the time we were told that there was information that we didn't have and, if we knew what it was, we would all support the invocation of the act. Ultimately, it turned out that wasn't the case and that the criminals who kidnapped Mr. Cross and Mr. Laporte were found through ordinary police methods.
You need to know on what basis it's decided that there was not sufficient other power that the authorities had to act. Also, was the emergency so grave that it was essential to invoke the act?