You raise a very important question. That came up in the earlier session that you folks had.
That's not spelled out in the act, but my recommendation would be that the government appoint a group that is at arm's length to the government. That's not required in the act, in my reading of it, but it should be, to satisfy the public that there's a full, fair and transparent review.
I wouldn't necessarily recommend that it be a judge who does it. It could be, but you could very well be taking people with other backgrounds and competencies to look at questions such as the nature of policing the capital, or a whole range of other issues.
In my view, it should be as broad-ranging as possible. It should definitely be independent of government. It should be able to look at all aspects of how we ensure that if there were a similar situation in the future, we wouldn't have to resort to the act again.