Thank you very much, Chair.
I'm going to be on the same theme. It seems to me that you've given us good advice with respect to starting our consideration of scope with section 62. Your question of “how”, I think, is very relevant to us.
You've also opened up the door to “how plus”, in the sense of privilege and how the deliberations of the committee need to be informed by the preinvocation of the emergency in the context of what we were dealing with at the time.
Is that a correct interpretation? In other words, we should start with the “how” in the period of exercising the responsibilities, and only revert to earlier in the context of particular testimony or a particular issue emerging.