When we talk generally in terms of large and liberal interpretation—and we talk about that sometimes in the human rights context and in other contexts— we talk about what is the purpose and what is the interpretation that is going to support the ultimate purpose of the legislation.
As the Speaker of the House pointed to in his ruling on the interpretation of uninterrupted debate, I would point to the modern rule or principle of interpretation, that
The words of an Act are to be read in their entire context and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention of Parliament.
Those are all the things you look to, including—as was stated—the purpose of this legislation.
We know this legislation has a number of purposes, but one of them is parliamentary supervision and one is compliance with the charter and other instruments.