I think that would be a good interpretation of the mandate. Indeed, it is to really look at the use of the power and how it has been used. Has it been used in proportionality? Has it been used abusively in the context that it was meant to address?
To have a better sense of the use of those tools, of course, indeed, looking into the broader context is sometimes essential. However, the main focus of the committee, as I understand it, is really to look into how it has been exercised.