It is safe to say that 338 MPs weren't sworn to secrecy and provided with private and confidential information for the prospect of supporting the confirmation of the Emergencies Act.
I'll use myself as an example, to be fair, because I can speak only to my own intention. I made a vote confirming the invocation of the act, given the information that was made publicly available. Given that the House order was provided after its revocation, it's now my intention to retroactively reflect on the proportionality, including the circumstances leading up to the invocation of the act, to fully understand and contemplate the spirit and the intention through which the House sent us here.
I don't expect you to comment on my intention. I just think it's an important reflection that we separate the original drafting of this and its contemplation with the set of circumstances that are before us, given how unique this legislation is.
My time is up. We will now go back to the Senate side, and I would ask if it would be okay that we keep the same order. Is that fine with the Senate side for this round?