Mr. Dufresne, I will give an example to confirm that I understand your answer.
If a witness appears before the committee and we need clarification of some of their answers, and that leads us to look into some things that might be considered part of the circumstances having led to the declaration being issued, will we not be permitted to ask those questions? Will this instead be handled on a case-by-case basis?
As you said at the outset, we're not working in silos, so we have no formal limitations on addressing issues that fall under either mandate, right?