In our deliberations, I think contemplating a brief report is more of an administrative function than it is a big debate. It would just be a statement of facts—an explainer, if you will—as to why we weren't able to report back.
As a co-chair, I feel a bit of a responsibility, so I do support Mr. Fortin's and Mr. Carignan's suggestion. I just hope that it's not something that requires a whole bunch of debate. Perhaps it would be best drafted by the co-chairs, signed off on and then presented to our committee while we're doing our draft report, perhaps on the 21st or in the first session after that.
I would be fine to support that. It would just be a very brief statement of fact about where we're at.