I just wanted to say that I would have liked it to be in the same motion. What I understand out of all this is that we are preparing to vote in favour of a meeting with these witnesses next week. The reason we have given for this is for us to settle the housekeeping motions.
I respect that point of view, but don't want to be cornered. I want to make sure that it's clear for everyone, unless I"ve misunderstood. But if that's the agreement, then I think the motion should reflect it and state immediately that next week, we will be hearing two witnesses, the RCMP and CSIS, and the week after that, the housekeeping motions.