Right. There are two that are similar.
It targets the exact same sentiment, so I'll start with that, because it's perhaps the easiest.
In paragraphs (d) and (e), there is effectively the exact same language. What I'm proposing is that we strike the language in paragraph (d) that reads, “including the analysis relied upon by the Minister of Justice in discharging his responsibilities under section 4.1 of the Department of Justice Act”, and the exact same language in paragraph (e) where it says, “including the analysis relied upon by the Minister of Justice in discharging his responsibilities under section 4.1 of the Department of Justice Act”.
The basis for this is that that kind of analysis is part of the legal advice that would have been provided to the Minister of Justice , and as such would fall under the well-entrenched principle of solicitor-client privilege.