On the same point of order, Mr. Chair, I think the deputy minister has indicated where he can.... He has been very forthright, and where he cannot be forthright, he has indicated. Just for everyone's edification, when we talk about solicitor-client privilege and what it covers, it can even cover the fact that an opinion exists or a number of opinions exist. That's what Mr. Daigle was explaining at the very end of his question, so there's a basis upon which certain things cannot be responded to.
I've been at this job for seven years, and I've heard many witnesses not answer certain questions. Sometimes It's because it's out of their realm of understanding or their scope or their expertise, etc., so I'll respectfully disagree with Mr. Motz.