With that being understood, and acknowledging the fluid way in which our steel travels back and forth, I asked the previous witnesses for testimony around whether or not they thought it made sense to have a more formal carve-out for steel, to be explicit in this friendship and this long-standing relationship, and to perhaps ensure within legislation or within the caveats of our agreement that our Canadian steel workers are duly protected, because we know there could be opportunities for our Canadian plants to be used as a bit of a flow-through for American products.
What would you like to see as a response to potential American protectionism?