I'll just add that I believe there are only a certain number—I believe four amicus briefs—that are being filed and that are legally convenient to be filed, as per the judge's request. It's probably preferable—that's the understanding—that it be a federal government amicus brief in support...with provincial backing, obviously, which we are happy to do, in spirit and every other way, as is evidenced by our appearance here today.
The 1977 treaty is certainly an interesting one, untested so far in terms of having come up in a situation like this, but I would say pretty relevant, if you're going to look at legal, diplomatic and other arguments for why this is something that should apply to that 1977 treaty. That arose under different circumstances, but under a democratic president, in 1977, to transport oil from [Technical difficulty—Editor] . It's certainly an interesting historical [Technical difficulty—Editor].