No, no—always. As colleagues, of course, it's always about working towards solutions, so I'm totally okay with all of that.
With respect to the question, I guess the way I would respond is this. I had an opportunity, of course, to raise this issue with the new U.S. trade representative, Ambassador Tai. The administration is one that will be respectful of trade agreements, whether it is the new CUSMA between the U.S., Mexico and Canada, but it also will be a proponent for multilateral rules-based trade. I share that because it would be our expectation that the U.S. will continue and follow through with that.
I think that what the work we are doing here in using a team Canada approach really is about—at many levels and through many interlocutors, including businesses and workers—is to demonstrate and make the case about how integrated our supply chain is. In relying on the Canada-U.S. supply chain, whether it's infrastructure, energy or rolling stock sectors, we really are able to make the case on that road map to Canada in the U.S., because whether it's construction materials that are sourced from Canada and are typically lower-carbon materials, or our energy and our electrical systems, which are among the cleanest in the world, or Canadian manufacturers that manufacture highly efficiently and generally emit less carbon, and these Canada-U.S. supply chains are so integrated—