Evidence of meeting #1 for Electoral Reform in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Danielle Widmer

1:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

(Motion agreed to)

In that case, we need to suspend the meeting for three minutes.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

I want to let my colleagues know that the meeting is now being televised and we can continue.

Mr. Deltell, go ahead.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

We don't want to make things personal, but we are surprised to see Mr. Holland participating in this meeting. I will explain why.

Mr. Holland is parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Democratic Institutions. However, the Prime Minister said that parliamentary committee meetings would be run and attended only by members of Parliament who are neither parliamentary secretaries nor executive council members. That's why I'm asking the question.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

You're right. However, Mr. Holland does not have the right to vote as part of our work and will not get involved in the proceedings. I don't know whether the committee objects to him being seated at the table to follow our discussion.

Does everyone agree that Mr. Holland can sit at the table during committee meetings?

Mr. Kenney, go ahead.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jason Kenney Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

Mr. Chair, I don't think a specific person is the issue here, but parliamentary secretaries overall. I think Mr. Deltell wanted to point out that a commitment has been made. I think, in general, all rules must be followed, without targeting any person in particular.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Okay. Does anyone else want to share their opinion?

Mr. Cullen, go ahead.

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

I only want to say that we have the same situation at the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development with Mr. Aldag. The parliamentary secretary attends the meetings, but can't vote or make comments.

I understand Mr. Deltell's potential concern, which Mr. Kenney has reiterated. There's nothing personal, but I have seen this arrangment work fine on the environment committee, where the parliamentary secretary is there simply as an observer. It's the right of any MP, I believe, to come to the committee. As I'm sure Mr. Holland or Mr. DeCourcey will confirm, there is no voting and all of that good stuff, but he gets to watch our deliberations, which I think is fine for him to be able to do.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Thank you.

Go ahead, Mr. DeCourcey.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

Matt DeCourcey Liberal Fredericton, NB

I wanted to make the same point as Mr. Cullen.

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Ms. Romanado, I assume you wanted to address the same issue.

I see that everyone agrees. Thank you.

Mr. Holland, welcome to the meeting.

We will now continue with the adoption of certain routine motions. I will start with the first motion.

Ms. Sahota, go ahead.

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

I'd like to move:

That the Committee retain, as needed and at the discretion of the Chair, the services of two analysts from the Library of Parliament to assist it in its work.

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

We can go to debate. Does anyone want to speak on this motion?

Go ahead, Mr. Reid.

1:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

I'm not speaking against or for it; I'm just trying to confirm that this is different from the routine draft that was passed out. Is that correct?

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Yes, that is correct. I noticed from the House orders that two have been assigned to this committee. Because of that fact, I figured that it would be more accurate to state it in this way, so that at the very least we would have two, and, if needed from time to time, perhaps more.

1:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

Would you be able to repeat the wording? I have a sense that the clerk may not have heard it. Have you already given a text to the clerk?

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

I can repeat it, absolutely:

That the Committee retain, as needed and at the discretion of the Chair, the services of two analysts from the Library of Parliament to assist it in its work.

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Thank you.

Is there agreement with this motion? Are there any objections? I don't see any.

(Motion agreed to)

I deem the motion adopted, and I would invite our two analysts to join us.

Welcome. Congratulations.

The second motion concerns the possible creation of a subcommittee on agenda and procedure.

Would anyone like to put forward a motion?

Mr. Cullen, go ahead.

1:30 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I have a suggestion. When I look at it, this is a pro forma version of how the subcommittee.... I've seen subcommittees work well, and for a committee potentially as complicated and as unique as this one, I think a subcommittee would serve us well.

I'd like the committee members to consider the inclusion on the subcommittee of a member from the Bloc and of Madam May as well, to allow for input. The subcommittee typically takes care of things like scheduling and vetting witness lists. I think it would be unfortunate if the subcommittee made a decision on either of those types of topics and then had to return to the main committee and try to pass a motion that in fact did not work for our colleagues.

I can move the specific motion, Mr. Chair, but—

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Do you have it written down?

1:30 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

I do have the actual terminology, but I don't have enough copies for the members. The one explicit change is to add two members, one being from the Bloc Québécois and one being Madam May.

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Okay. Then it would read:

That a Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure be established and be composed of the Chair, the two Vice-Chairs, two members of the government named by the Whip and a Member from the Bloc québécois and from the Green Party; that the Chair of the Committee be the Chair of the Subcommittee.

Is that correct?

1:30 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

That is the addition that I would look to make.

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Are there any comments or questions?

1:30 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

I'd like to thank Nathan very much for that proposal, because I was going to ask if I could please play a role on the subcommittee on agenda and procedure.

The same is true for my colleague from the Bloc Québécois.

Thank you.