In terms of what Professor Russell was saying, I would agree with you entirely if our system of Parliament was members of Parliament who weren't controlled by party discipline. In effect, a false majority—and again, I'm paraphrasing Professor Russell and of course also Professor Donald Savoie—in our system of Westminster democracy, more than in any other Westminster democracy, creates power in the executive. Our prime minister has more power relative to our system than a U.S. president has in their system, or a U.K. prime minister or an Australian prime minister has in theirs, and so on. That's why there's a question of legitimacy when 39% of the votes translates into control of the executive and the legislative branches.
Would that be a concern of yours at all?