I like the idea of locking everyone in a room and coming to a consensus.
You mentioned a two-thirds vote. Certainly that would improve the legitimacy, but ultimately I do agree with the comments that Professor Macfarlane has made that there is something special about electoral reform and Canadians need to be considered and consulted. When we look at other changes that have tried to happen around electoral reform, there does seem to be a higher level of precedent. In B.C., for example, when they had the referendum, all previous referendums in B.C. had been 50% plus one, but they increased the threshold specifically for that one.