Evidence of meeting #18 for Electoral Reform in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was candidate.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jean-Sébastien Dufresne  President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle
Eric Maskin  Adams University Professor, Department of Economics, Harvard University, As an Individual
Peter John Loewen  Director, School of Public Policy and Governance and Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, As an Individual

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Mr. Cullen, we're at six and a half minutes. I let it go because it was really fascinating—

11:50 a.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Sure.

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

—and I thought it was very enlightening for the committee and its report, but we'll go to Mr. Rayes now, please.

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Dufresne, I have another question for you.

You visit New Zealand regularly. You have said that many people from various organizations in your circle are calling for proportional representation. What you forgot to say, however, is that New Zealand did in fact hold a referendum first to legitimize the process and the change in the voting system that was implemented.

Do we agree on that?

11:55 a.m.

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

You said earlier that we should test out a voting system and then, I assume, ask citizens for their opinion after two or three elections. Is that what you are proposing?

11:55 a.m.

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

Jean-Sébastien Dufresne

It is a combination of various elements, but yes, that is partly what I am proposing.

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

In short, your proposal to the committee is to hold a referendum after two elections to ask the people if they want to keep the new voting method or return to the current system, a first past the post system.

11:55 a.m.

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

Why should the committee study the voting method you are proposing any further? We have heard solid arguments from experts who have given us references and examples. They have stated that no voting system is perfect. Should we try out a new system? Should we not instead get the public's go-ahead before we change the voting method?

11:55 a.m.

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

Jean-Sébastien Dufresne

You are perfectly right. Once again, we believe that the question must be put to the people.

As I said earlier, there is a combination of elements to be considered. I think we can agree on one thing. You seem to feel strongly about the public making an informed choice and that it should not be up to MPs only. That is a very important to us as well. It seems clear that we agree on that. We want to see what the best way of doing that would be.

In New Zealand, a certain approach was taken. In Japan, it was a different approach. Different approaches have been used in various places. As many people have said, the reality in Canada is different. In that case, why not have a different process?

In our opinion, the best way would be to fully involve citizens in the decision. We think that the idea of creating citizen juries could come out of the committee's work. Citizens could be chosen randomly to examine the committee's recommendations. This would provide some objective information.

People have often said that there could be different outcomes to a referendum.

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

That's right, in favour of the people. In favour of the people.

11:55 a.m.

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

Jean-Sébastien Dufresne

It could depend on how the question is phrased. A citizen jury that evaluates the situation objectively...

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

Can you give us an example of a country that changed its voting method based on a jury system? Can you name one?

11:55 a.m.

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

Jean-Sébastien Dufresne

We are looking for a Canadian way of doing things. In Canada, that could be a way of ensuring that the decision is not solely in the hands of MPs, which is a concern; the final decision should be up to voters, which is also your concern. We are looking for some kind of arbitration.

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

Is there any country in the world that has changed its voting method based on that kind of consultation system?

11:55 a.m.

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

Jean-Sébastien Dufresne

I don't know any place where that combination has been used.

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

In short, you would like us to use that combination to change the fundamental aspect of our democracy instead of consulting the entire population. I would like to highlight the following from all the surveys that have been conducted.

You say your organization wants to conduct consultations in order to gather public input and foster civic participation. More than 60% of Quebec's population and more than 70% of Canada's population are in favour of a referendum on whether or not we should change our voting system.

11:55 a.m.

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

Jean-Sébastien Dufresne

We are in favour of that.

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

If you really want to achieve your objectives, why don't you advocate for something that has been proven elsewhere instead of your approach to something that is so fundamental?

11:55 a.m.

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

Jean-Sébastien Dufresne

The real question is what do we have to fear. Are we afraid of letting citizens try it?

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

Why are we afraid of trusting citizens after properly informing them and after the committee has completed its work? Why not give them the chance to express their views? We are not in California where there is a steady stream of referendums. To my knowledge, there have not been a lot of referendums in Canada. Why are we afraid of that? If you are confident that the system you have just proposed is sound, why are you afraid to ask citizens that question?

Noon

President, Mouvement Démocratie Nouvelle

Jean-Sébastien Dufresne

They have to be asked the question under the best possible conditions. We are looking for the best way to proceed.

Noon

Conservative

Alain Rayes Conservative Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

Yes, we should have the resources. Let us recommend that the committee give the government the resources to do the necessary outreach. Let the public decide after that. If one party believes in it, it will advocate for it as well.

Noon

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Thank you.

To end this round of questions, I will give the floor to Mr. DeCourcey.