I will give you a copy at the end, but it is under the “open democracy” section on your website. What I just said can be found there verbatim.
I would go even further. You said our electoral system is unfair. That is a very strong statement, in my view. Various experts have told us that our system is perhaps not as unfair as some suggest. They are valuable sources, experts who hold doctorates who offered their considered opinions.
You said that 85% of your members want to change the system to a proportional one. You cite a survey you conducted among your members.
Other surveys conducted across Canada have shown that over 70% of Canadians want a referendum.
You say the surveys conducted by your organization would be a valid basis for making a proposal to the committee. In that case, why wouldn't a survey of Canadians also be a credible justification for consulting the entire population to confirm, not whether they want a new voting method, but whether they support the proposed change?
Why are you saying two different things?