Evidence of meeting #22 for Electoral Reform in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was schools.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jane Hilderman  Executive Director, Samara
Dominic Vézina  Strategic Advisor, Institut du Nouveau Monde, Institut du Nouveau Monde
Taylor Gunn  President, Civix

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

It was 2007.

7:20 p.m.

President, Civix

Taylor Gunn

Yes, the fall of 2007 in Ontario. We also did a parallel students' assembly on electoral reform in 2007. We gathered 103 kids and put them through a five-day boot camp on electoral systems. I did feel bad for the kids, but they loved it. They went back to their schools. We did a tandem classroom consultation and had 5,000 Ontario kids participate. The kids come back and presented to the assembly what the students' opinions were: MMP. The assembly then recommended MMP to Ontario citizens.

So yes, if there's a referendum, among other things we'd be planning on doing a parallel one.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Excellent.

I'm curious. Did the results of those referendum much of the time—or maybe all of the time—mirror the election result amongst the actual voters?

7:20 p.m.

President, Civix

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Was that true in the case of the referendums as well? Was the result the same, or was it mirrored?

7:20 p.m.

President, Civix

Taylor Gunn

I think they might have voted yes for MMP in Ontario in 2007, and I would have to go back to 2009 and 2005.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Okay, I asked more out of curiosity than anything else.

7:20 p.m.

President, Civix

Taylor Gunn

What's interesting is that, in Ontario at least, it did imitate the lower participation in casting a referendum ballot. We suffered the same thing in schools.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

In terms of timelines, in order to conduct a side-by-side referendum, what would your organization need to do that?

7:20 p.m.

President, Civix

Taylor Gunn

It's additional work, but we could factor that in to whatever timeline we're used to having with the Student Vote program.

I could expand on comments around what you think I would suggest for adults, but we're used to doing a lot in little time, as I'm sure all three of us are.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Great. Thank you very much.

7:20 p.m.

President, Civix

Taylor Gunn

Could you give me 10 seconds just to quickly say something?

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Sure.

7:20 p.m.

President, Civix

Taylor Gunn

Actually, John, there is a great urgency in this conversation. The Prime Minister said it's our last election under first past the post, so there's urgency.

7:20 p.m.

Voices

Oh, oh!

7:20 p.m.

John Taylor

I'll say something that's really important. This is different from any other conversation that took place in each of those three previous referendums. I don't know P.E.I. from a little while back, but at least in B.C. and Ontario, no politician, especially a premier, came out and said they wanted that system. That's why this is a much different system, and that's why I would suggest that anyone who is afraid of a referendum shouldn't be. The parties have way more at stake if they proceed with those same positions going into a referendum.

There's urgency. It could be the last way we vote, and we could change the system we've had for almost 150 years.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Are you indicating that you think it would be a good thing for the public to be engaged in a referendum on this topic?

7:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Answer very briefly, please.

7:25 p.m.

President, Civix

Taylor Gunn

I would love to get into that. I am sure we all would, but did I use up all of my time?

7:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Yes, you did. Take 15 seconds to answer that question.

7:25 p.m.

President, Civix

Taylor Gunn

I think, as it has been said by several of your witnesses, including today, if you don't do a really thorough, substantial, and what can be considered credible consultation process, I don't see how you can't go to a referendum, presuming that this would then cause the consultation you didn't.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Sorry, I am a little unclear. What you are saying is that there needs to be a thorough consultation process, and then a referendum would be—

7:25 p.m.

President, Civix

Taylor Gunn

What I am saying is that right now I don't think this is thorough. I am suggesting that you make it thorough.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB

Sorry, I just want to make sure that it is clear.

7:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia

Let's just clear this up, yes.